Side-by-side
| Aspect | TDSR | MSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cap | 55% of gross income | 30% of gross income |
| What's included | ALL monthly debts (housing, car, cards, etc.) | Housing loan only |
| Applies to | All bank property loans | HDB + EC (developer) |
| Considers existing debt | Yes — debt deducted from cap | No — measured against income only |
| Stress-tested? | Yes — at medium-term rate | Yes — at medium-term rate |
| Effective from | 16 Dec 2021 (was 60%) | Long-standing |
| Authority | MAS Notice 645 | MAS Notice 632 + HDB |
The binding-cap rule
When MSR applies (HDB / EC), the lender computes both TDSR and MSR caps and picks the lower one. That lower cap defines the maximum monthly mortgage instalment, which drives the maximum loan.
For most HDB buyers without other major debt, MSR is binding because 30% of income is lower than the 55% TDSR cap minus typical debt.
Worked examples — same buyer, different property
Buyer: gross monthly income $10,000, existing debt $1,500/month (car + credit cards).
Scenario A — buying private condo
- TDSR cap: 55% × $10,000 = $5,500. Less existing debt $1,500 → $4,000/month for new mortgage
- MSR: not applicable
- Max loan at 4% stress, 25y tenure: $4,000 × 189.45 ≈ $757,800
Scenario B — same buyer buying HDB
- TDSR cap: $4,000/month (as above)
- MSR cap: 30% × $10,000 = $3,000/month for new mortgage (no debt deduction)
- Binding: MSR is lower → $3,000/month
- Max loan at 3% stress (HDB), 25y: $3,000 × 210.85 ≈ $632,550
Same income, same debt — but the HDB framework gives a lower loan amount because MSR forces a stricter ratio. This is one reason mass-market buyers often opt for private condos (where TDSR alone applies, allowing for a higher loan-to-income).